Editorial

Stop framing privacy and security as a trade-off. At scale, the two are inseparable. Security tools cannot fully offset an architecture that collects too much personal data, stores it in one place, and keeps it for too long. This design creates a larger target and amplifies damage when access is

97% of executives use personal devices to access their work accounts, but these aren’t designed to defend against espionage, zero-click exploits, or data exfiltration. So convenience has come with a tradeoff of vulnerability. In today’s hybrid world, the smartphone in a leader’s pocket holds

The old security playbook is failing. For years, organizations built digital fortresses, believing that a strong perimeter firewall and traditional antivirus software were enough to keep threats at bay. That model is now obsolete. The perimeter has dissolved, scattered across countless remote

How long does it take for a threat actor to move from initial compromise to lateral movement within a corporate network? Just 18 minutes in mid-2025 , down from 48 minutes the year prior, according to recent industry reporting. This phenomenon, usually referred to as 'breakout time' in the

The traditional security perimeter is gone. It was not breached by a single attack but dissolved by a thousand strategic business decisions: the shift to the cloud, the rise of the remote workforce, and the integration of third-party SaaS applications into critical workflows. For years, security

The castle-and-moat security model is obsolete. For years, security leaders have heard the same refrain: the perimeter is dead, erased by cloud adoption and remote work. In its place, perimeterless architectures like Zero Trust have emerged as the new standard for protecting scattered data,